How many HBS round 3 interviews, and impact on R1 and R2 WL
Saturday, April 10th, 2010Sandy,
From HBS’s directors blog the February 12th post mentions- “Candidates who do not receive interview invitations in round 2 will be considered for spots on the waitlist” – I am one of those WL w/o interview. I had written off HBS and now I’m unsure of what WL w/o interview actually implies – any idea? I suppose there is potential they would include me in the Round 3 interview invites depending on the strength of Round 3 which go out next Friday but didn’t know if you had any idea what HBS’s strategy was. Thanks for your help.
Intuition and common sense can lead you down a dark rabbit hole when it comes to WL w/o interview and what it means. Sometimes it is just decision fatigue over thre in Dillon House, that, and keeping folks guessing. My guess is R2 WL kids w.out inerviews, and any R1 kids w/o interviews, if those are still around???? should cert. get interviewed in the R3 windowHRH blog says
Most interviews will take place from May 3-6th. We will be conducting round 3 interviews here on campus and in London and Palo Alto.
That sounds like 3 days PA (18 interviews) 2-3 days London (12-18 interviews) and GOD knows how many on campus, where they can throw lots of adcoms  in the fray if they have to (and adcoms not all that busy once they chew thru R 3 apps and rest up for 2+2). I’m thinking ~200 interviews in R3 total, which will also include a lot of college seniors. For a R3 accept cohort of ~110-125 (maybe ~30-40 being college seniors who will defer). So total add to the class after R3 blows thru is  60-80 kids. R2 deposits are due at end of April, so there will be one more big WL shake out in May, where they will cut down the current ~200-240 WL to 50, 25, etc. (but I am not sure how many of those will be accepts, sorry, that is the missing piece of this puzzle)  and string folks out thru June/July, They usually fold the tent in early July -w. last two WL accepts being kids who live in Cambridge already (if you want to incrementally improve your odds, move here, same for Stanford, which is explicit about limiting last x spots to kids who already live near school, seriously.










